No Chermicals Allowed! (Ulsaker Bees in New Zealand 2011)

Urban_Bees_Movie_Project_Ulsaker_2011.wmv Watch on Posterous

No Chermicals Allowed!  (Ulsaker Bees in New Zealand 2011)

 

Posted via email from The Hook of Magog

Untitled

Posted via email from The Hook of Magog

Here's the Risk: "Occupy" ends up doing the bidding of the global elite

"Many OWS participants might be completely unaware of who actually launched it. Upon investigation, what one finds is a daisy chain of non-profit foundations"

www.Globalresearch.ca nails another important story that mainstream news ignores, proving once again that history is not what we percieve through establishment channels.  There is always something deeper going on behind the scenes that betray the simpleton scripts of our mainstream news channels.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27708

Here's the Risk: "Occupy" ends up doing the bidding of the global elite by Patrick Henningsen
Global Research, November 17, 2011
The Guardian - 2011-11-16
History shows us it is easy for 'grassroots' campaigns to become co-opted by the very interests they are fighting against. A 21st-century grassroots movement faces many pitfalls. This was as true back in 1968 as it is today. It could be infiltrated by law enforcement and intelligence agencies, or co-opted by a major party. As the state continues to creep further into our lives, activists can expect that it will use all its resources – not just the violent reaction seen in New York overnight, but also its agents, informants and surveillance packages – in its effort to monitor both sides of any serious social debate. Even bleaker, however, is the possibility that the movement was actually planned and launched by the very establishment activists thought they were waging a battle against in the first place. The larger the movement, the more interested a major party becomes in absorbing it into either the left or the right side of the current two-party paradigm. The sudden emergence of America's Tea Party movement in 2007 is a good example. Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul, its inventor, used it as a springboard to highlight libertarian and constitutional issues during his 2008 campaign. Soon after, it was co-opted by key political and media influencers from the US right wing, associating itself less with a libertarian manifesto, and more with emerging figures within the Republican establishment. Now it is has morphed into nothing more than a block of voters whom the Republican party can rely to strike a deal with during an election cycle. Arguably, the Occupy Wall Street movement has already drifted into the shadow of the Democratic party – with a number of Democratic establishment figures from the top down endorsing it. The Democrats' own media fundraising and media machine, Move On, has visibly adopted the cause. Like the Tea Party before it, the Occupy block would swing a close election during a national two-party race, functioning as a pressure-release valve for any issue too radical for the traditional platform. Alongside this is the threat of being infiltrated. Scores of declassified documents, along with accounts from veteran activists, will reveal many stories of members who were actually undercover police, FBI or M15. In the worst cases of infiltration, undercover agents have acted as provocateurs. Such incidents normally serve to radicalise a movement, thus demonising it in the eyes of society and effectively lessening its wider political appeal. Although the global Occupy movement has branched out in an open-source way, many of its participants and spectators might be completely unaware of who actually launched it. Upon investigation, what one finds is a daisy chain of non-profit foundations, all tied together by hundreds of millions per year in operational funding. The original call for Occupy Wall Street came from non-profit international media foundation Adbusters. Like many non-profits, Adbusters receives its funding and operating capital from other behind-the-scenes organisations. According to research conducted by watchdog Activistcash, Adbusters takes a significant portion of its money from the Tides Foundation, an organisation partnered with one of Wall Street billionaire oligarch George Soros's foundations, the Open Society Institute. Although mostly hidden from the public eye, all major foundations and professional thinktanks undertake research and host training seminars, which are used to influence certain public and foreign policies, and thus, must have a political agenda. Theirs is the venue of choice for activities that cannot officially be conducted on the government clock. Freedom House is another of Soros's Open Society partners. It supports the Centre for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies (Canvas), an organisation started by Serbians Ivan Marovic and Srdja Popovic. After playing a pivotal role in the CIA-backed deposing of Serbia's Slobodan Milosevic, the western media hailed Marovic as a democratic genius, but it came out later that his programme came out of an elite Boston thinktank's "regime change" manual, From Dictatorship to Democracy, written by Harvard professor Gene Sharp. Sharp's book is a bible of the colour revolutions – a "regime change for dummies". His Albert Einstein Institution has received funds from the National Endowment for Democracy and the Open Society Foundations, and his work serves as a template for western-backed opposition leaders in soft coups all around the world. There are also reports of Canvas activity during the early days of Occupy Wall Street, including a video of Marovic himself addressing the general assembly. Currently, Canvas are touting their recent role in working with Egyptian and Tunisian protesters from as early as 2009, teaching skills that helped bring down their presidents and spark regional revolt. When the dust settles and it's all said and done, millions of Occupy participants may very well be given a sober lesson under the heading of "controlled opposition". In the end, the Occupy movement could easily end up doing the bidding of the very elite globalist powers that they were demonstrating against to begin with. To avoid such an outcome, it's important for a movement to have a good knowledge of history and the levers of power in the 21st century. • Patrick Henningsen is speaking on Deep Politics and the Revolutions Business at Tent City University at St Paul's on Sunday, 20 November at 4pm
Patrick Henningsen is a frequent contributor to Global Research.  Global Research Articles by Patrick Henningsen

Posted via email from The Hook of Magog

Fukushima is 33 times worse than Chernobyl

Fukushima is being quantitatively measured as being 33 times worse than Chernobyl. Where is the mainstream press now, having already repeated the mantra that Fukushima is not as bad as Chernobyl?

In the more scientific press, Fukushima is being called the next level of nuclear disaster, something far beyond Chernobyl in scope, reach, impact.  It is the "China Syndrome" typifying the worst fears connected to a runaway nuclear meltdown.

Cause for comparison - The results of Chernobyl left 1 million dead at an early age, and it continues to shorten lives.

The effects of radiation are fearsome by any objective measurement, and yet we can't avoid the rise in permanent higher levels of "background radiation" around the world. 

 

Short Videos of Fukushima

1. Humorous Youtube vid here - FUKUSHIMA Radiation Levels Are like Gas Prices
2. Illustrative video of radiation flows on the world map, mostly Northern Hemisphere
3. Frightening in-depth explanation from Helen Caldicott, a very knowledgeable woman on this subject.  Here, Helen Talks About the Horror of Fukushima and makes it all very understandable.

 

 

Posted via email from The Hook of Magog

Bilderberg is Busted - Let's Hope This Trend Continues!

Bilderberg is Busted - Let's Hope This Trend Continues!

 

Today the largest and most influential news site in the world has 5 stories on the Bilderberg Group ( archived here --> http://www.drudgereportarchives.com/data/2011/06/10/20110610_195609.htm )

1. Swiss Politicians To March On Bilderberg, Demand Arrest Of Kissinger...
2. Italian Politician 'bloodied' sneaking into Bilderberg hotel...
3. BEHIND THE CURTAIN...
4. Secret Agenda Leaked by Mole...
5. THE LIST...

What is the Bilderberg Group? 

"(I)n 1954, the international financiers decided that the world had become so small and their interests intersected so often, that they must have regular, annual meetings. That year they met at the Bilderberg Hotel in Holland, and took the name "Bilderberg" for themselves." - American Free Press

Why don't you know about this?

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."  - David Rockefeller, Baden-Baden, Germany 1991

Why are we hearing about this now?

Today is a new milestone for alternative news!  Radio talk show host Alex Jones has broken 3 concurrent stories about the secretive Bilderberg Group on the biggest news site in the world, www.drudgereport.com. 

1. The first story in red text tells the tale of Swiss People’s Party representative Dominique Baettig promising to march into the Bilderberg meeting and confront various attendees, including Henry Kissinger, and to make arrests.
2. The second story tells about Italian MEP Mario Borghezio given a bloody nose by Bilderberg security as he attempted to sneak into the the meeting.
3. The third story is a watered-down assessment of who these people are and the policies they plan to implement on the world from behind closed doors, out of sight from their electorate (a crime in many countries including the US).
4. The fourth story comes from Alex Jones' site.  His organization is at liberty to report news as they see fit, unencumbered by "editorial review" by the corporate elite (who are not surprisingly represented heavily at Bilderberg meetings).  As this story concludes - "... the plan is to take down national sovereignty, impose drastic austerity measures, hold fire sales on national assets, consolidate wealth and power, and use an endless economic crisis as an excuse to usher in world government, a one-world currency, and a sprawling high-tech police state."
5. The fifth story is a published list of this year's attendees, a who's who of global elite.  The people who push for their unilateral and autocratic "New World Order" (their term) are represented by the giants of global finance, government, industry and military.

Why is this a big deal? 

 

Bilderberg breaking on a site like Drudge is a big deal because alternative news researchers and whistle blowers have been reporting on this organization for many years without much affect.  Jim Tucker has been following and reporting on the Bilderberg Group for 25-years and hasn't broken anything this big into the mainstream... until now.

 

It all started just recently, only a few years ago.  Groups like "We Are Change" have been confronting Bilderberg attendees about their illegal record of attendance at these meetings and publishing video accounts on Youtube.  Using less conventional means of getting alternative news out to the public, mass media is all but lost in the new Internet media like dinasaurs in a tar pit.  Their only recourse is to restrict the Internet.

 

Where are other credible sources located so that I can research this for myself?

 

There have been many alternative efforts eroding the walls of mass media silence over the years:

 

Investigative Documentaries -

1. Secret Societies - Conspiracy Theory Jesse Ventura
2. Wake Up Call - New World Order (2008)
3. Secret Societies: The Bilderberg Group

Investigative Books -

1. Review of Jim Tucker's book "Bilderberg Diary"
2. Review of Daniel Estulin's book "The True Story of the Bilderberg Group"

Archives on Websites -

1. Bilderberg.org website (ha, are the Bilderbergers too worried about closing down this site for fear of making them more popular?) - http://www.bilderberg.org/
2. List of news articles and videos on an Alex Jones site -  http://www.prisonplanet.com/archive_bilderberg.html

And much, much more linked here -- http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_bilderberg.htm

 

What do Bilderberg members think about all this unwanted openness?

 

According to reports from insider-moles who allegedly go to Bilderberg meetings, the elites are very concerned about being published, confronted, having their record of illegal behind-closed-doors policy making published and critiqued (even aggressively confronted here and here) by the newly informed public.

 

Is the era of Bilderberg secrecy finally coming to an end after over 5 decades of complicit news blackout by the elite mass media (whose owners are also long time attendees)?  Let's hope so. 

 

What else are they accused of conspiring throughout the last 5+ decades?

 

The Bilderberg Group was principally responsible for 1) establishing the EU, 2) the Euro currency, engineering through the media and lawmakers and politicians immigration and social policies that 3) erode national sovereignty of the US and Europe, placing friendly insiders into positions as 4) heads of state to further their global government agenda, 5) expanding profitable resource-wars in the Middle East without votes at home or provocation abroad, bringing about efforts to 6) tax carbon use on small entities while handing out exemptions to their insider buddies, putting out policy papers that seek to 7) restrict and tax the free Internet, expansion of Orwellian 8) police state structures on the false premise that society will be safer if all liberties are taken away and handed over to an unaccountable elite structure that tracks and traces everything we do, and of course the massive transfer of wealth away from state coffers into the hands of insider financiers via the 9) banker bailouts, trillions given to elites who are chiefly responsible for crashing risky derivatives bubbles that set the global recession into motion and now of course these same insiders are using free bailout trillions to buy up depressed assets in the environment of crash that they created.  News media incorrectly calls these people "incompetent" because they are unable to fix the economy with QE1, QE2 and austerity measures.  In fact, these people are not incompetent at all, they are criminals raiding the tresury under the color of law and false pretense.

 

Aren't these the very same people who tell us "If you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to fear" as they track and trace everything the common people do.

 

 

Is Bilderberg really breaking news on Drudge right now?

 

Getting this kind of news onto Drudge is more valuable than the rare opinion piece that makes it through the mass media gatekeepers. Now that the Bilderberg non-secret has made it prominently onto Drudgereport, we can expect to see more of it elsewhere.  Drudge is credited with breaking the attempted spiked story of Monica Lewinsky in 1998, proving that corporate-owned media can't plug all the leaks.  Now more than a decade later, the same lessons are being learned by the corporate media.

 

 "Drudge has millions of readers and more influence than any other single newsmaker in America." - Guido Fawkes

 

According to MuStat, the Drudge Report reaches 1.5 million unique visitors per day while Alex Jones' main website brings in 350,000 unique visitors per day - about 1/4 as much.  That means, for every day Alex Jones broadcasts his message on Drudge, he is effectively reaching 1.5 million people that wouldn't normally visit his site.  In addition, the Drudge readers tend to be media savvy and consider Drudge to be a news maker.  It only takes a push to set a snowball effect into motion.

 

For collapse-proof strategies that apply locally and for ideas on how to live a healthy post-collapse lifestyle, write to me at InfoHive@gmail.com 

 

The above compiled by Tate Ulsaker

Founder of Direct INFO

Branch Manager of Advanced Personnel in Nelson, NZ

 

"Anyone may publish anything I write anywhere they wish without permission, just please link it back if convenient to do so." - Tate

See the full gallery on Posterous

Posted via email from The Hook of Magog

CNN forced to admit - 3 nuclear reactors melted down

CNN forced to admit - 3 nuclear reactors melted down after quake, Japan confirms

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/06/06/japan.nuclear.meltdown/index.html?eref=rss_topstories&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_topstories+%28RSS%3A+Top+Stories%29&utm_content=Google+International

 

Japan confirms that they are experiencing full-blown "China Syndrome" meltdowns in Fukushima.  Not controlled meltdowns like Chernobyl, but out of control, spilling into the air and ocean and spreading around the world even though the US Environmental Protection Agency and US Food and Drug Administration are refusing to follow protocol and monitor radiation levels in the ocean and fish respectively. 

 

Which countries were telling us that everthing would be fine, not to worry, just continue about your business, trust your government?  That would be Japan, US and most of the western mainstream press.

 

In contrast, which countries were giving warnings, criticizing the response and secrecy of Japanese authorities and specifically Tokyo Electric Power Co?  That would be China, South Korea, Iran and Russia to name a few.

 

There can be no sharper contrast.

 

On March 20, 2011, CNN reported: 

President Barack Obama and numerous health officials have assured U.S. residents that while radioactive particles from Japan may be detected in the U.S., there will be no health consequences from it, as the particles will disperse over the more-than-5,000 miles separating the site from the U.S. West Coast. Point of comparison: Chernobyl, a far larger nuclear disaster that happened in 1986, is closer to New York than Fukushima Daiichi is to Los Angeles, and no health effects were felt in the United States from Chernobyl, either.

 

Three days earlier the Russian President said, "If you look at what has happened in Japan, it is of course a colossal national disaster, a catastrophe," Medvedev said.

 

Four days earlier, the Tehran Times quoted the Chief Engineer of the Chernobyl disaster - "Right now the situation around the (Fukushima) power station is already much more serious than what we have today around Chernobyl," says Savin, the chief engineer of Project Uktrytiye, or Enclosure, the group of scientists charged with the continuing effort to seal off and clear out the radiation from Chernobyl. "Walking around Chernobyl is much more safe than being anywhere near the damaged plant in Japan right now. So the risk to human health there is already serious."

 

Who was right?  Obama and western mainstream press or is it the media from everyone else?

 

Honesty tends to flow more freely from sources that have less to gain by selling lies and more to gain by being honest.  This is why I like to listen to insiders who step up to the challenge and report difficult truths about their own country or organization.  These people can be found on alternative news sites that are run on a shoestring and reach millions of people because of the content supplied freely over the internet.

 

Alternative news on Fukushima - http://youtu.be/P3lSLpSHBuY 

 

Think about it - Is the western mass media a trustworthy source for informaton about the Fukushima disaster?  If not, then what else are they not trustworthy to report?  I can think of quite a few issues where reporting by western press is collusive, biased and wrong-headed.

 

Lesson - Power Corrupts. 

 

I suppose that when you have so much power consolidated by such a few big brands that own collectively most of the mainstream outlets, you will have collusion and bias and a sellout nature when it comes to reporting.  They collectively want "business as usual" moving forward... even if it means going off a cliff.

 

- by Tate Ulsaker

See the full gallery on Posterous